Serrano (555) 018-2400 Contact

Privilege logs that hold up when the production schedule slips

Privilege logs rarely fail because a document was wrongly withheld. They fail because the entries are vague, inconsistent or late. A log built entry by entry during review, to one agreed format, survives a slipping schedule; a log reconstructed in the final week usually does not.

Why logs break down

Under deadline pressure, reviewers default to generic descriptions: a communication seeking legal advice, a draft reflecting counsel input. Repeated a few thousand times, those phrases give the other side an easy argument that the log does not let anyone test the claim.

The second failure is inconsistency. When two reviewers describe the same email chain differently, both entries become harder to defend.

A format that carries weight

A good entry identifies the author and recipients by role, names the lawyer involved, and describes the subject specifically enough to show why privilege applies without revealing the advice itself.

Hands filing manila folders into a pale archive box on a walnut table
FieldWeak entryStronger entry
AuthorCompany employeeDirector of pricing
CounselLegalNamed in-house counsel
DescriptionLegal adviceRequest for advice on distributor rebate terms
BasisPrivilegedAttorney-client communication

The right time to write a privilege entry is the moment the reviewer understands the document. Every week after that, the entry gets vaguer.

Serrano Litigation, partners' note

Keeping the log steady when dates move

  1. 01

    Lock the format

    Settle fields and phrasing with the other side or the agency before production begins.

  2. 02

    Assign an owner

    One senior reviewer signs off every batch of entries before it is merged.

  3. 03

    Sample weekly

    Pull twenty entries at random and read them cold, looking for the vague ones.

  4. 04

    Fix forward

    Correct patterns in the next batch rather than rewriting the whole log at the end.

When a challenge arrives anyway

Respond with specifics. Offer supplemental descriptions for the categories in dispute, and consider producing redacted versions where a document mixes business and legal content. Courts and agencies tend to reward the party that engages with the detail.

Common questions

Do we have to log every email in a chain?

It depends on the agreed protocol. Many parties log the top message of a chain with a note on the earlier messages, but that needs to be agreed in advance.

Can business advice be privileged?

Only where the predominant purpose is legal advice. Mixed documents are the most frequently challenged category, so describe them with particular care.

What if we find a mistake after production?

Raise it promptly. Most protective orders include a clawback process, and acting quickly matters.

This article is general information, not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every matter turns on its own facts.

A review bench built for heavy production

Review, privilege calls and logging run under one partner from first batch to certification.

24+ Years in practice

900+ Matters handled

11 Offices nationwide

40+ Attorneys on staff

Trust

How review teams describe working alongside us

Illustrative comments from the in-house leads who ran document review alongside our team while the production schedule kept on moving.

“The weekly log sample was the habit that saved us. We found the vague entries ourselves, months before anyone else could.”

Priyanka RaoDiscovery Counsel

“One partner signed off every batch. When the schedule slipped, the quality of the entries did not slip with it.”

Marcus BellLitigation Manager

“They agreed the log format with the other side before review began, and the challenge we expected never arrived.”

Anna WhitcombeAssociate General Counsel

“The weekly log sample was the habit that saved us. We found the vague entries ourselves, months before anyone else could.”

Priyanka RaoDiscovery Counsel

“One partner signed off every batch. When the schedule slipped, the quality of the entries did not slip with it.”

Marcus BellLitigation Manager

“They agreed the log format with the other side before review began, and the challenge we expected never arrived.”

Anna WhitcombeAssociate General Counsel

Contact

Start a conversation

Worried about a log you have already served? Send the protocol and a sample of entries, and we will tell you plainly where the risk sits.

Charleston office1180 Harbor Exchange, Suite 2200, Charleston, SC 29401

Thank you. This is a design demonstration, so nothing was sent. On a live site this request would reach the intake desk within one business day.

Sending this form does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please leave out sensitive details until we have confirmed there is no conflict of interest.