“I forward the quarterly brief to our audit committee chair unedited. It is the only outside note that arrives already written for a director.”
Tracking regulatory change and market pressure
Written by the partners who run the matters, for the boards and general counsel who have to decide what happens next.
Second requests and the timeline a board should plan for
Why the calendar moves before the legal theory does, and what the first six weeks of a review ask of the business.
Reading a civil investigative demand without losing the first month
A plain reading of what an agency has asked for, what it has not, and which of the two drives the first response.
Vertical arrangements and the questions reviewers ask first
Supply agreements draw attention for reasons that rarely appear in the agreement. Here is where reviewers start.
Privilege logs that hold up when the production schedule slips
Logs fail for procedural reasons far more often than for substantive ones. A short discipline at intake prevents most of it.
Board minutes as evidence, and how to write them for a later reader
Minutes are read years later by people who were not in the room. Write for that reader and the rest of the record gets easier.
Preparing custodians before a first deposition
Most preparation is spent on content. Good sessions spend it on process, pace and the shape of a careful answer.Contact
Start a conversation
Read something that sounds like your situation? Tell us which article and what has happened, and the partner who wrote it will reply.
Readers
Read by the people who brief the board
Illustrative comments from the general counsel who use the journal to prepare their own directors well before a matter turns into a real crisis.
“The piece on privilege logs changed how our review team works before we ever had a dispute. That is the kind of reading that pays for itself.”
“Short, specific and honest about what varies from matter to matter. I read it on the train and usually act on something by the afternoon.”
“I forward the quarterly brief to our audit committee chair unedited. It is the only outside note that arrives already written for a director.”
“The piece on privilege logs changed how our review team works before we ever had a dispute. That is the kind of reading that pays for itself.”
“Short, specific and honest about what varies from matter to matter. I read it on the train and usually act on something by the afternoon.”
Authors
The partners who write the journal
Each post is written by an attorney who has run that kind of matter, then read closely by a second partner.
Antitrust and competition
Merger review, conduct investigations and civil enforcement
Regulatory defense
Agency inquiries, consent decrees and compliance remediation
Complex commercial
Contract, partnership and shareholder disputes
Why us
From reading the journal to briefing the firm
Most clients read us for a year before they call. Here is what changes once a matter is theirs.
How we workThe author takes the call
If a post prompted your enquiry, the partner who wrote it will usually join the first conversation.
Your record, mapped early
The habits described in the journal become the first fortnight of your matter: custodians named, holds issued, sources listed.
Advice sized to the question
A narrow question gets a short written answer. We do not turn a quick view into a project unless the facts call for it.
Board-ready updates
Updates follow the one-page format the journal recommends, so directors see the same shape every time.
Confidential from day one
Enquiries are handled in the same access-logged environment as live matters, even before an engagement is signed.
Plain drafting
Filings and letters are written to be read quickly, with the record cited beside the sentence it supports.
Ready to put senior trial counsel on your matter this quarter?
Once a quarter we send a short brief on regulatory movement and the filings worth reading, written by the attorneys who handled them.
1,400+ general counsel read the quarterly brief

